- Stake
- US$10.00
- Result
- +US$10.50
Settled from the results feed · 22 Sept
BAI8 researches the match and sets each player’s chance next to the bookmaker’s price. Checkouts, throw order and the deciding leg are read, not assumed.
A positive edge is an estimate, not a promise. 18+, bet lawfully where you are.
We make Luke Littler 62%, and the 1.72 on offer implies 58.1%. The 3.9‑point gap is the edge.
A worked example, priced from thirteen research passes.
Every badge here is the real one.
Real calls our research agents published this week. Open any of them to set it against your own bookmakers’ prices, with every source behind it.
Where our chance beats the bookmaker’s price, the gap is your edge, counted in points: 52% against 47% is 5 points.
Our research calls, the most likely first.
We make Josh Rock 66%, so fair odds are 1.53. The app sets that against the prices at your own bookmakers and shows the edge.
We make Luke Littler 62%, so fair odds are 1.61. The app sets that against the prices at your own bookmakers and shows the edge.
We make Michael van Gerwen 61%, so fair odds are 1.65. The app sets that against the prices at your own bookmakers and shows the edge.
We make Over 9.5 56%, so fair odds are 1.79. The app sets that against the prices at your own bookmakers and shows the edge.
We make Nathan Aspinall 53%, so fair odds are 1.90. The app sets that against the prices at your own bookmakers and shows the edge.
We make Gerwyn Price −1.5 50%, so fair odds are 2.00. The app sets that against the prices at your own bookmakers and shows the edge.
Every bet you keep is settled from the official result. The misses stay in.
The average says how a player scores. A leg is won by finishing it.
Scoring and finishing read side by side, because the leg is won on the double.
Legs split by who threw first, and who holds up in a last leg.
Finishing under pressure, with a stage effect treated as noisy, not permanent.
A best of 11 lets an upset through where a best of 19 tends not to.
Three events in nine days arrive on the oche with the player.
A handicap gets its own chance, never one guessed from the match price.
How do visit state, checkout routes and throw order change a leg?
How often a visit that starts on 101 to 170 wins the leg. The line traces the winning finish thrown most often in the simulation.
The score the line on the board finishes.
When the match reaches its final possible leg, and who wins it.Weighted across every simulated match.
Instruments from a real report, with example data.
The real app card, replaying a worked example: thirteen passes out, one chance back, every source attached.
The only figure so far is what the price implies: the bookmaker’s opinion, not ours. Nothing has been researched yet. Run the assessment for our own number.
One screenshot is enough. We read every leg, price the whole bet and research the match behind it.
One screenshot, one bet.
Get the whole slip researched.
Record a bet, paper one, or just watch. Each is graded by the final result, misses included.
Recording a bet never places it. BAI8 never holds money or promises a result.
Only Real counts toward your record. No money moves.
Real affects only your tracked record. Neither paper nor watching touches your balance, exposure or P&L. BAI8 places no bet and moves no money in any case.An example ledger, misses included. Your own starts empty.
Every bet you keep settles into your profit, your return on stake (ROI) and which sports pay.
An example account, losses included. Yours starts empty.
72 bookmakers, each matched to the countries that license it. Pick yours.
Also licensed here, not in our feed: bet365, Midnite and talkSPORT BET.
See what was read, which findings moved the chance and by how much.
Thirteen passes, one question each: injuries, form, tactics, schedule, conditions, officials.
A finding counts only as much as its sources earn. A stale or late source scores zero.
No finding can move the number far, and a weakly sourced one moves it less.
The findings become one chance per result, adding up to exactly 100%.
Only now does the price come in. Where our chance beats it, you see the gap.
Built by engineers and AI agents. Every figure here is read from the code.
54 instruments draw each sport the way its fans read it. Prices are checked against 72 bookmakers. More than 7,000 automated tests run before every release.
A failed pass is retried deeper. A run that still cannot finish is never published, and your credit comes back.
No research pass sees the bookmaker’s odds, so our chance cannot copy theirs.
Re-run four times before the start, at no cost to you.
At 72 hours, 24 hours, 6 hours and 75 minutes before the start.Every finding shows what it did to the number and links to what it read.
One question, put to each: Luke Littler v Luke Humphries. Example data.
13 research agents read the match, often for over an hour.
Both won their afternoon matches, the order of play lists this one, and the PDC has published nothing about either player. The pass looked and found nothing, which is a result rather than an absence of one.
His three-dart average over recent events sits at or near the top of the tour and above Humphries’. The gap holds against top-sixteen opponents, not only in early rounds.
He sets up more legs in fifteen darts or fewer than any other player, so Humphries often has one visit fewer to finish. Against the throw this is how breaks happen.
Their recent meetings over short formats have tilted Littler’s way, mostly through breaks of throw. Longer formats and older meetings are discounted heavily.
In a ten-season sample of best-of-11 PDC stage matches, the player with the higher recent average won a little more often than the starting figure implied. The pattern held in both halves of the sample.
Both won their afternoon matches in a similar number of legs and have the same break before the evening session. Travel to Basel was the same for both, and travel alone is not fatigue.
An indoor arena with a standard European Tour stage, a neutral crowd for two English players, and both are seasoned stage players. The pass looked and found nothing, which is a result rather than an absence of one.
Prize money here counts to the same rankings for both players. Needing a result is not the same as being able to get one, and the pass found nothing that separates them.
Scores are called and checked, and the rules apply the same to both players. There is no mechanism here worth applying.
Both players spoke after their afternoon matches. No change of equipment, schedule or plan was mentioned, so there is no information event to apply.
A second stats service and a specialist outlet reached the same conclusion from their own figures. Independent confirmation raises how far the claim is trusted.
A widely shared claim that the player who walks on second wins more often was written as a precise rule for the registry to test. Until it survives a holdout, it moves nothing.
A best of 11 lets a run of missed doubles decide the match, and Humphries is the steadier finisher. Part of the scoring edge is taken back.
A pick and a price. No working shown.
A fast answer from one prompt, in about 2 minutes.
An evening of open tabs, then a hunch.
Every source graded before it counts
Sources rarely named, so you cannot check them.
Links to what its search found, none of them graded.
Whatever you happen to read, weighed by feel.
A chance for every outcome, adding to 100%
A pick, with no chance put on it.
A view, maybe one number, never every outcome.
A hunch, not a probability.
Your price checked against 72 bookmakers
One price at one bookmaker.
A quoted price, if its search finds one. It may be stale.
The two or three bookmakers you have open.
Re-checked 72 hours, 24 hours, 6 hours and 75 minutes before the start
Posted once, never updated.
True as of the moment you asked.
Whenever you remember to check.
New bets on the Desk every day
A tip when they get round to posting one.
Nothing until you ask.
Your own shortlist, if you make one.
Every call settled, misses included
The wins they choose to show.
Nothing settled, nothing scored.
Whatever you remember to write down.
ChatGPT and Claude are named for comparison only. Neither maker endorses BAI8.
Thirteen research passes, a chance for every result. Re-reading your own is free.
Still unsure? A person answers every email.
[email protected]No. It holds no bookmaker account and never moves your money. Recording a bet as real only adds it to your own ledger.
A bet you record at the price you were shown, with a stake you choose and no money involved. It is graded by the result like any other. Watching records the call with no stake at all.
You upload a screenshot of a bet. BAI8 reads each leg and prices the whole bet, including legs that depend on each other. A leg it cannot read is marked unread, never guessed.
From the research, never from the bookmaker. An assessment builds each chance from the match’s own evidence, and every finding is capped and weighted by how credible its sources are. Only then is the price brought in to compare. Before an assessment, there is no number.
As long as the match needs, often more than an hour. Thirteen research passes read the match, and every source they find is graded for credibility and weighted by it. If a run cannot finish, the credit is refunded.
One assessment of one match. Opening one somebody else has already run costs a credit too, and re-reading one you hold is free. A new account gets five credits to try BAI8, valid for ten days. Every plan includes credits, and packs bought on their own never expire.
BAI8 compares prices at more than seventy bookmakers, each matched to the countries that license it, and shows them in your odds format, your currency and one of six languages. Use BAI8 only where betting is legal for you.
Your edge is the gap between our chance of a result and the chance the price implies. A positive edge is an estimate, not a promise. 18+, bet lawfully where you are. Betting loses money for most people who do it.
How Darts prices work, and how BAI8 reads them.